For many years there seemed to be one reliable method to store information on a laptop – employing a hard drive (HDD). On the other hand, this kind of technology is currently showing its age – hard disk drives are actually noisy and slow; they can be power–hungry and frequently produce lots of heat for the duration of serious procedures.

SSD drives, in contrast, are fast, take in significantly less energy and tend to be far less hot. They provide a whole new approach to file access and data storage and are years in advance of HDDs when it comes to file read/write speed, I/O efficiency as well as energy efficiency. See how HDDs fare up against the more recent SSD drives.

1. Access Time

Image

Because of a revolutionary new solution to disk drive operation, SSD drives enable for considerably faster data file accessibility rates. With an SSD, data access instances are much lower (just 0.1 millisecond).

Image

The technology powering HDD drives goes all the way back to 1954. Even though it’s been drastically enhanced throughout the years, it’s nonetheless can’t stand up to the ground breaking technology behind SSD drives. Through today’s HDD drives, the top data access speed you can reach varies somewhere between 5 and 8 milliseconds.

2. Random I/O Performance

Image

Because of the unique radical data storage method embraced by SSDs, they feature swifter data access speeds and quicker random I/O performance.

For the duration of MITS’s trials, all SSDs revealed their capacity to work with no less than 6000 IO’s per second.

Image

Hard drives offer reduced file access speeds as a result of older file storage and accessibility concept they’re by making use of. In addition, they show significantly sluggish random I/O performance compared to SSD drives.

For the duration of our tests, HDD drives managed an average of 400 IO operations per second.

3. Reliability

Image

SSD drives are made to include as fewer rotating elements as is feasible. They use a comparable concept to the one employed in flash drives and are more dependable compared with standard HDD drives.

SSDs come with an common failure rate of 0.5%.

Image

With an HDD drive to work, it must rotate a few metal hard disks at a minimum of 7200 rpm, keeping them magnetically stable in the air. They have a great number of moving parts, motors, magnets along with other gadgets jammed in a small space. Hence it’s no surprise that the standard rate of failing of an HDD drive varies among 2% and 5%.

4. Energy Conservation

Image

SSDs do not have moving parts and need minimal cooling down power. In addition, they need a small amount of energy to perform – trials have established that they’ll be operated by a standard AA battery.

As a whole, SSDs consume between 2 and 5 watts.

Image

HDD drives are famous for becoming noisy. They demand more electricity for air conditioning reasons. On a hosting server containing a range of HDDs running regularly, you need a great number of fans to keep them cool – this makes them far less energy–efficient than SSD drives.

HDDs take in in between 6 and 15 watts.

5. CPU Power

Image

Because of SSD drives’ higher I/O functionality, the key server CPU can easily work with file calls a lot quicker and preserve time for other functions.

The standard I/O delay for SSD drives is just 1%.

Image

By using an HDD, you’ll have to spend time waiting for the outcomes of one’s data ask. Because of this the CPU will continue to be idle for further time, waiting around for the HDD to respond.

The average I/O delay for HDD drives is approximately 7%.

6.Input/Output Request Times

Image

In the real world, SSDs function as admirably as they managed in the course of the checks. We ran a full system back–up using one of the production servers. Throughout the backup operation, the regular service time for I/O requests was in fact under 20 ms.

Image

Using the same hosting server, yet this time loaded with HDDs, the outcome were completely different. The regular service time for any I/O request fluctuated somewhere between 400 and 500 ms.

7. Backup Rates

Image

Talking about back ups and SSDs – we’ve detected a fantastic enhancement in the data backup rate since we turned to SSDs. Currently, a common server backup will take solely 6 hours.

Image

We used HDDs mainly for quite a while and we have pretty good familiarity with precisely how an HDD performs. Generating a backup for a web server furnished with HDD drives is going to take about 20 to 24 hours.

The VPS plans and the typical shared website hosting plans accounts feature SSD drives by default. Be a part of our family here, at MITS, and find out how we can help you help your website.


  • Service guarantees

  •  
  • Each one of our Virtual Private Servers is installed for you at absolutely no cost. 99.9% network uptime. Full root/administrator access.
  • Compare our prices

  •  
  • Quickly examine the resources and tools provided by our Virtual Private Servers. Discover which VPS package will give you exactly what you’ll need to deal with your multi–media online presence effortlessly.
  • Compare our hosting plans
  • Contact Us

  •  
  • We are on duty for you 24 hours a day to resolve any kind of queries with regards to our VPS solutions. 1–hour response time guarantee.